Contenido

Semiconductores Industria
The Practical Guide to Surface Science (2026)

D54c15105cfe94f786c500e4091d6ea65457608fde49ba183c8f862814a54249?s=100&d=m
Escrito por
Dr. Amit Pratap Singh
PhD, Delhi University Post Doc - AIST Japan
Guest Author
leer más
alidad
Reviewed by
Dr. Alidad Amirfazli
Dr. Amirfazli, a leading expert in surface wetting and superhydrophobic coatings, has 250+ publications, edits Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, and has received multiple research awards.
Scientific Advisor & Co-founder
leer más
D54c15105cfe94f786c500e4091d6ea65457608fde49ba183c8f862814a54249?s=100&d=m
Written By

Dr. Amit Pratap Singh

Guest Author

PhD, Delhi University

Post Doc - AIST Japan

alidad
Reseña escrita por

Dr. Alidad Amirfazli

Scientific Advisor & Co-founder

Dr. Amirfazli, a leading expert in surface wetting and superhydrophobic coatings, has 250+ publications, edits Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, and has received multiple research awards.

This is a practical guide to Surface Science for researchers working in the Semiconductors Industry.

En esta nueva guía aprenderás todo sobre:

  • Principios cruciales de la ciencia de superficies
  • The significance of surface science measurements for the Semiconductors industry
  • Normas y directrices ASTM aplicables

Vamos a sumergirnos en ello.

Semiconductores

Executive Summary

What it covers: How semiconductor process, packaging and materials teams use contact angle, surface free energy, surface tension and sliding angle. Each measurement is tied to a real fab problem, such as wafer cleaning, resist adhesion or adhesive residue.
Key insights: Water contact angle is a quick, numeric check that a wafer is clean and primed before resist goes on. The receding angle matters more than the static angle wherever liquid must leave a surface cleanly, as in immersion lithography. On rough surfaces, a Clemson lab found symmetric drop fitting failed and switched to a polynomial fit.
Business value: A numeric contact angle replaces pass or fail visual calls with a value you can trend across tools, shifts and lots. The Dropometer measures with no network connection, which suits fabs that restrict cloud software and connected devices.
Standards to follow: SEMI/ASTM D7490 describes surface free energy of films and coatings from contact angles of two probe liquids. ASTM F21 and ASTM F22 describe visual atomizer and water break tests for hydrophobic films. ISO 25178 defines surface texture parameters, which help explain contact angle on rough surfaces but do not measure wetting.
Bottom line: Measure water contact angle after each clean and prime step, and surface free energy when adhesion fails. Start with the step where yield is lost, then book a 15-minute consult about testing it on your own wafers or coupons.

Capítulo 1: Introducción

In semiconductor manufacturing, many yield losses start at a surface. A wafer that still carries a thin organic film after cleaning gives poor resist adhesion. A package surface with adhesive residue gives weak bonds and delamination later.

These are the places where wetting decides yield in semiconductor work:

The Dropometer contact angle and surface energy kit measures contact angle, surface tension, surface free energy and sliding angle with one portable setup. Its method was validated against a KRUSS DSA100E in two peer reviewed papers. If you are new to the terms, start with wettability.

We use the following surface properties to understand the behavior of Semiconductors products and improve their quality.

Capítulo 2: Medición del ángulo de contacto

El ángulo de contacto cuantifica la humectabilidad de una superficie representando el ángulo entre la superficie de un líquido y una superficie sólida.
Investigación de Dropletlab

Sample Image taken from Droplet Lab Tensiometer.

Joven – Método Laplace

Método polinómico

Ángulo de contacto dinámico

Ideally, when we place a drop on a solid surface, a unique angle exists between the liquid and the solid surface. We can calculate the value of this ideal contact angle (the so-called Young’s contact angle) using Young’s equation. In practice, due to surface geometry, roughness, heterogeneity, contamination, and deformation, the contact angle value on a surface is not necessarily a single consistent value but rather falls within a range. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as the advancing and receding contact angles, respectively. The values of advancing and receding contact angles for a solid surface are highly sensitive to many parameters, such as temperature, humidity, homogeneity, and minor contamination of the surface and liquid. For example, the advancing and receding contact angles of a surface can differ at different locations.

Ángulo de contacto dinámico frente a ángulo de contacto estático

Las superficies y los recubrimientos prácticos muestran naturalmente histéresis de ángulo de contacto, lo que indica un rango de valores de equilibrio. Cuando medimos ángulos de contacto estáticos, obtenemos un solo valor dentro de este rango. Confiar únicamente en mediciones estáticas plantea problemas, como una repetibilidad deficiente y una evaluación incompleta de la superficie con respecto a la adherencia, la limpieza, la rugosidad y la homogeneidad.

In practical applications, we need to understand how easily a liquid spreads (advancing angle) and how easily it is removed (receding angle), such as in painting and cleaning. Measuring advancing and receding angles offers a holistic view of liquid-solid interaction, unlike static measurements, which yield an arbitrary value within the range.

Esta información es crucial para las superficies del mundo real con variaciones, rugosidad y dinámica, lo que ayuda a industrias como la cosmética, la ciencia de los materiales y la biotecnología a diseñar superficies efectivas y optimizar los procesos.

Aprenda cómo se realiza la medición del ángulo de contacto en nuestro tensiómetro

Para una comprensión más completa de la medición del ángulo de contacto, lea nuestra medición del ángulo de contacto: la guía definitiva

Open Benchmark Data: Contact Angle & Surface Energy

These reference measurements show how deionized water wets four standard substrates measured with the Droplet Lab Dropometer. Use them as visual and numerical benchmarks when you're checking your own sample preparation, treatments, and chemistry.

Full contact angle and surface energy datasets (including additional liquids and statistics) are available on our dataset hub.

Glass - DI Water
Glass - DI Water
Nylon - DI Water
Nylon - DI Water
PMMA - DI Water
PMMA - DI Water
Teflon - DI Water
Teflon - DI Water

The droplet images above are taken from the same benchmark series as our open dataset. For each substrate and probe liquid we report:

● Advancing and receding contact angles (and hysteresis)
● Derived surface energy (SFE) values based on multi-liquid measurements
● Measurement conditions, uncertainties, and sample preparation details

Comparing your own droplet shapes and angles against these references is a fast way to spot contamination, treatment drift, or unexpected changes in wettability.

Capítulo 3: Medición de la tensión superficial

Esta propiedad mide la fuerza que actúa sobre la superficie de un líquido, con el objetivo de minimizar su superficie.

Medición de tensión superficial

Sample Image taken from Droplet Lab Tensiometer

Tensión superficial dinámica

La tensión superficial dinámica difiere de la tensión superficial estática, que se refiere a la energía superficial por unidad de área (o fuerza que actúa por unidad de longitud a lo largo del borde de una superficie líquida).

La tensión superficial estática caracteriza el estado de equilibrio de la interfaz líquida, mientras que la tensión superficial dinámica explica la cinética de los cambios en la interfaz. Estos cambios podrían implicar la presencia de tensioactivos, aditivos o variaciones en la temperatura, la presión y la composición en la interfaz.

Cuándo utilizar la medición dinámica de la tensión superficial

Dynamic surface tension is essential for processes that involve rapid changes at the liquid-gas or liquid-liquid interface, such as droplet and bubble formation, coalescence (change in surface area), the behavior of foams, and the drying of paints (change in composition, e.g., evaporation of solvent). It is measured by analyzing the shape of a hanging droplet over time.

La tensión superficial dinámica se aplica a diversas industrias, incluidas las cosméticas, los recubrimientos, los productos farmacéuticos, la pintura, los alimentos y las bebidas, y los procesos industriales, donde la comprensión y el control del comportamiento de las interfaces líquidas son esenciales para la calidad del producto y la eficiencia del proceso.

Aprenda cómo se realiza la medición de la tensión superficial en nuestro tensiómetro

Para una comprensión más completa de la medición de la energía superficial, lea nuestra medición de la tensión superficial: la guía definitiva

Capítulo 4: Medición de la energía superficial

La energía superficial se refiere a la energía requerida para crear una unidad de área de una nueva superficie.
231

Sample Image taken from Droplet Lab Tensiometer

Aprenda cómo se realiza la medición de la energía superficial en nuestro tensiómetro

Para una comprensión más completa de la medición de la energía superficial, lea nuestra medición de la energía superficial: la guía definitiva

For benchmark contact angle and surface energy values on glass, nylon, PMMA, and Teflon, see the Open Benchmark Data panel above or visit our Dataset Hub for full CSV downloads.

Capítulo 5: Medición del ángulo de deslizamiento

El ángulo de deslizamiento mide el ángulo en el que una película líquida se desliza sobre una superficie sólida. Se emplea comúnmente para evaluar la resistencia al deslizamiento de una superficie.

Ángulo de deslizamiento 1

Sample Image taken from Droplet Lab Tensiometer

Aprenda cómo se realiza la medición del ángulo de deslizamiento en nuestro tensiómetro

Para una comprensión más completa de la medición del ángulo de deslizamiento, lea nuestra medición del ángulo de deslizamiento: la guía definitiva

Capítulo 6: Aplicaciones en el mundo real

Within the Semiconductors industry, several case studies exemplify the advantages of conducting surface property measurements.

Photoresist adhesion after cleaning and priming

Resist sticks well only to a surface that is clean and primed to the right wetting state. Water contact angle after the clean and the primer step gives a number you can trend for every lot, in place of a visual check.

Our wafer cleaning and photoresist adhesion page sets out the test plan. SEMI/ASTM D7490 describes working out surface free energy from contact angles of two probe liquids, often water and diiodomethane. The US R&D site of a global fused silica and quartz maker runs all three on one unit; see the fused silica and quartz case study.

Photoresist adhesion after cleaning and priming

Adhesive residue in packaging

Tapes and temporary bonding adhesives can leave a thin film after removal that weakens the next bond, mold or underfill step. A hydrophobic residue raises the water contact angle, so a spot map across the part shows where cleaning fell short.

ASTM F22 describes a visual water break test and ASTM F21 an atomizer test; both give a go or no go call. Contact angle adds a number at chosen spots and supplements those tests rather than replacing them. On rough surfaces, the Clemson graphene electrode case study shows why the fitting method matters, and ISO 25178 defines the texture parameters to report alongside.

Adhesive residue in packaging

Receding contact angle in immersion lithography

In immersion lithography, water sits between the lens and the wafer while the stage moves. If the receding contact angle of the resist or topcoat is too low, water can stay behind on the wafer and leave defects.

Sliding angle on a tilting stage shows how easily water moves off a surface. The drop at the point of motion gives the advancing and receding angles. Compare topcoat candidates on the same stage and tilt rate. Our sliding angle measurement guide and the glossary entry on dynamic contact angles explain the method.

Receding contact angle in immersion lithography

Somos sus socios en la resolución de su negocio y tecnología Desafíos

Si está interesado en implementar estas u otras aplicaciones, póngase en contacto con nosotros.

Capítulo 7: Normas y directrices

In an industry where precision reigns supreme, how can Semiconductors manufacturers ensure their products withstand scrutiny? The answer lies in standards and guidelines: the compass that guides them through the complex maze of quality and performance.

SEMI/ASTM D7490-13 (Reapproved 2022), Solid Surface Tension (Surface Free Energy) by Two‑Liquid Contact Angle

What it is

Standard practice for estimating a solid’s total surface free energy and separating it into dispersive and polar components by measuring sessile‑drop contact angles of two probe liquids (one polar, one non‑polar) of known surface tension on the surface. It is intended as a quantitative, comparative surface‑readiness metric for wetting/adhesion process control within an approximate applicable range of ~20-60 mN/m.

When to use it

Pre‑print/coat/bond readiness checks

Use fixed‑time contact angles plus calculated γ components to confirm surface cleaning/treatment/priming is within a validated “pass band” before committing to downstream trials.

Process tuning & troubleshooting

Trend γs,polar/γs,dispersive and spot‑to‑spot variability to diagnose under‑treatment, contamination, non‑uniform treatment, or material/lot shifts.

In-scope / Out-of-scope

In scope
  • Substrates/coatings and pigment disks/coupons where sessile drops can be imaged and fit.
  • Two‑liquid contact angle measurements using a defined polar and non‑polar liquid set (commonly water + diiodomethane).
  • Calculation of γs,total and its components (γs,dispersive and γs,polar) using a stated model (e.g., Owens-Wendt / Fowkes‑type).
  • Comparative, protocol‑controlled measurements for QC/process control and investigation.
Out of scope
  • Downstream performance qualification (e.g., peel strength, print quality, environmental aging), these must be validated separately.
  • Universal “material constants”: results are liquid‑set/model/protocol dependent and should not be compared across different methods without equivalence work.
  • Porous/swelling/absorbing solids without time controls: time‑dependent angles require a defined capture time and QC rules to be meaningful.
  • Liquid surface tension measurement or surface chemistry identification: use other methods/standards for those needs.

Minimum you must report (checklist)

  • Substrate/coating description + history: material, finish, lot, treatment/primer/cleaning steps, side/orientation, and region definition.
  • Probe liquids: identity (polar vs non‑polar), grade/source, lot/date opened, and contamination/purity handling.
  • Measurement geometry + method: sessile drop contact angle; imaging and fitting approach used.
  • Droplet volume + dosing controls: target volume (µL) and how dispensing accuracy is verified/controlled.
  • Capture timepoint + environment: θ @ fixed time (e.g., 2.0 s ± tolerance), temperature, and relative humidity.
  • Replicates + statistics: number of spots per liquid and reporting statistic (e.g., median + IQR), including same‑side/region rules.
  • Measured angles + QC rules: θpolar and θnon‑polar, acceptance criteria, and documentation of any rejected/re‑run spots.
  • Calculated outputs + assumptions: γs,total, γs,dispersive, γs,polar, plus the model and liquid set used for calculation.

This method provides an image‑backed, quantitative surface‑readiness signal but does not by itself guarantee adhesion or print performance. Any pass/fail gates must be calibrated per material family + treatment recipe + ink/adhesive system by correlating D7490 outputs to your downstream KPI.

How to interpret results (guardrails)

  • Use as a controlled comparative metric: keep the protocol fixed and do not mix models or liquid sets when trending or setting limits.
  • Focus on γs,polar for treatment sensitivity (with controls): interpret trends relative to your “golden sample” and validated pass band, not as a standalone promise of adhesion.
  • Treat variability as a first‑class signal: high IQR/spot‑to‑spot spread often indicates non‑uniform treatment or contamination even when the median looks acceptable.
  • Respect applicability and time dependence: if angles change with time due to absorption/swelling, only compare results at the defined capture time and flag unstable droplets for re‑test.

Ahora te toca a ti

We hope this guide showed you how to apply surface science in the Semiconductors industry.

Ahora nos gustaría entregárselo a usted: 

Feel free to leave a comment below—we’d love to hear from you.

Frequently asked questions

Which surface measurement should a semiconductor lab start with?

Start with water contact angle after each clean and prime step, since it shows residue and priming level quickly. Add surface free energy when adhesion fails or you change a primer or adhesive. Use surface tension for wet chemistries, and sliding angle for topcoats. Our contact angle y surface energy guides explain each method.

What water contact angle shows that a wafer is clean?

There is no single universal value. The right limit depends on the substrate, the clean chemistry and any primer. Even ASTM F22 does not define universal contact angle limits. Set your own limits from known good and known bad wafers, measure at a fixed time after the drop lands, and use several spots per wafer.

How do I measure the surface free energy of a wafer or film?

Measure contact angles of two or more probe liquids, usually one polar and one apolar, then calculate surface free energy from them. SEMI/ASTM D7490 describes this two liquid method for films and coatings. Our contact angle to surface energy calculator does the sums. Do not compare results across different models or probe liquid sets.

Which standards apply to contact angle in semiconductor work?

SEMI/ASTM D7490 covers surface free energy from contact angles. ASTM F21 y ASTM F22 describe visual atomizer and water break tests for hydrophobic films. ISO 25178 covers surface texture, not wetting. The Dropometer uses the sessile drop method, so run a correlation study before you report results under F21 or F22.

Can the Dropometer be used in a fab or secure site with no network?

Yes. It measures contact angle and surface tension with no network connection, and drop images are captured and analysed on the phone. Internet access is needed once, to activate licences. The apps can run on a phone that your own IT team manages. Our secure site measurement page covers the setup.

How accurate is the Dropometer?

The drop shape method was validated against a KRUSS DSA100E in two peer reviewed papers, one in Review of Scientific Instruments and one in Colloids and Surfaces A. Published contact angle accuracy is 0.35 degrees. Automatic edge and baseline detection gives the same reading from the same image. See our validation papers.

Do published studies use the Dropometer on electronic materials?

Yes. A Clemson group used it to track batch to batch variation in laser inscribed graphene electrodes. Splitting fabrication into batches with laser downtime cut contact angle variation. A University of Saskatchewan team used it as a reference check for their own setup in a carbon nitride film study. Browse more on our client citations page.

Standards, evidence and resources

1. Industry standards Use cases
  • Wafer cleaning and photoresist adhesion: Water contact angle after each clean and prime step shows whether organic residue remains and whether the wafer is ready for resist, before pattern lifting shows at develop.
  • Offline, air gapped and secure site measurement: Measuring needs no network connection, which suits fabs that restrict cloud software; the site security office still decides whether camera devices may enter controlled areas.
Case studies
  • Global fused silica and quartz maker, US R&D site: A fused silica and quartz supplier to semiconductor and optics markets added pendant drop surface tension, contact angle and surface energy on one Dropometer; results not yet shared.
  • Clemson University graphene sensor lab: On rough laser inscribed graphene, symmetric drop fitting gave errors up to 60%, so the lab used polynomial fitting; bare graphene read 58.6 ± 1.4° in water.
Client citations (our analysis of each paper) Use case collections Further resources